Thursday, September 2nd, 2010
iPad math: a consumer looks at value
In a recent post Surfing the value waves I mentioned having purchased an iPad. Here’s the value calculation that drove me to buy it. Of course it’s cool and fun—but does it make economic sense?
It first occurred to me in discussions with my wife—who wants a big, flat, thin TV like all our friends have—that we could EACH get an iPad, skip the TV, and pocket the change. The iPad is not quite “there” in terms of programming, but for what I mainly watch (movies and sports), it’s halfway there (the movies half.) TVs have gotten so cheap, this was actually about break-even—so there wasn’t a lot of change to pocket.
In this sense the iPad (and the Internet in general) is a textbook example of a disruptive rival to the TV—not as good in many respects, definitely cheaper—but with the future potential to knock the whole competitive game into a different orbit.
But then I started adding up the other gadgets that an iPad could replace. I should mention that while I do not own all of these, as a “weekend warrior” musician and photographer, I own more than most people. Your mileage will probably vary.
We’re obviously proud of our KVC model. We think it helps explain a lot of the mystery surrounding “how to compete in the knowledge economy.”